Who cares about brand names

I’ve been thinking since last night about an article I read at futurity.org, about the relationship between brand reliance and religiosity. A study shows that religious people care less about brand names than non-religious people. Even asking people to spend some time thinking about religion makes them temporarily less influenced by the appeal of name brands.

The correlation between religiosity and caring less about brand names does not surprise me at all. What struck me as odd was the explanation given by the people who did the study, that brand names satisfy a desire to express self-worth, and that religion apparently satisfies that same desire – thus reducing the religious person’s inclination to use brand names for that purpose.

They do say that it is a sub-conscious rather than conscious effect, which makes it hard to confirm or refute. But I would explain the correlation in a rather different way. Religion is all about ultimate reality and ultimate meaning. I would think anyone looking for ultimate meaning would see choosing products for the brand names they carry as fairly superficial.

Growing up, I went to church every week, but I never thought of myself as particularly religious. I developed a bias against brand names, but that was due to my mother’s teaching about how to spend money wisely, and in her opinion it was almost always preferable to get a less expensive no-name product.

Brand names mean advertising, and advertising costs money – a cost which is passed on to the consumer. So buying a brand name means you are paying not only for the product itself, but also for the advertising, which is of no benefit to the consumer. There may be times when a brand name is the better purchase, but that is only when other criteria (e.g. quality of materials, availability of service/repair) show that the product is genuinely a better value.

The study focused on products likely to be chosen for their “self-expressive” nature, such as clothing, rather than more functional products, where reliance on brand names is less likely to play a role. That means they’re about image, and people interested in ultimate reality will naturally have less interest in projecting a particular image.

Perhaps the people who did the study would say that I’m saying the same thing they are, but in different words. I don’t know anything about them, but I would tend to hazard a guess that they are not themselves particularly religious. I simply don’t think in terms of “expressing self-worth”; perhaps they do not think in terms of ultimate reality and ultimate meaning.

(If you should happen to be interested in a fuller explanation of their study, you can read their paper.)

Advertisements

One Response to Who cares about brand names

  1. modestypress says:

    Pauline, you are very bright–brighter than I am, in fact. So you probably have explored and discarded the following thought.

    There are many different religious beliefs. Many major faiths, and many subordinate varieties. In Christianity, there is Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant (many varieties…).

    Although I don’t buy it, religion is the most successful “product” (for lack of a better word for an atheist such as I to use) ever come up with for satisfying the angst of the existential dilemma.

    As no religious belief system is entirely successful and satisfying, these are all brands)

    Of course when you have the best product (in a global sense), why bother with other “brands.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: